From Jesus to Christ the First Christians Scholar Review
Wonderful historical business relationship
When I first saw this four 60 minutes documentary mini-series, well it just blew me away.. Considering the subject matter, its a miracle how neutral it represents the flow it covers.. Its secular vantage betoken allows someone to learn many,many things about those times... If your an historical buff than its a "MUST Run across"..
14 out of xiv institute this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Examination of Electric current Historical Scholarship on Jesus
Some in the Evangelical Customs in the United States take criticized this documentary because they experience that information technology neglects "their side" of the Jesus story; in other words, the documentary neglects to portray Jesus in terms of a "literal" interpretation of the Canonical Gospels and other writings from the Bible. However, this is not what the documentary's goal. The evangelist and fundamentalist positions are quite well-documented, and can exist easily found through nationwide tv. These include such entities as "The Family Channel", "The 700 Club", and the belatedly "Dr Gene Scott". (And, by the fashion, each may exist slightly different depending upon which denomination is doing the propagating, be they Baptists or Methodists or Lutherans.)
Removed somewhat from preconceived and prescribed religious interpretations, "From Jesus to Christ" is PBS Frontline'south try to explain in layman'southward terms the current state of historical scholarship concerning a man named Jesus of Nazareth who probably lived 2000 years ago and whose proper name and story would eventually be the ground of a world-broad organized religion. Primary sources (i.e. sources written or created during the actual time) concerning Jesus are near not-real. A couple of scant sources survive that were written a few decades after Jesus' death, such equally a short passage from the writings of Josephus. It has also been hypothesized that a source of Jesus' sayings, nicknamed "Q" by scholars, likewise existed in the starting time decades after Jesus' passing. The beginning gospel of Jesus was probably written circa 70 CE, a good 40 years after Jesus' death. From an historian's perspective, this is non a tremendous corporeality of historical evidence by which to reconstruct the historical life of Jesus equally independent from the Jesus of faith.
Several scholars in the documentary make a distinction betwixt myths most Jesus that come up from the Bible versus theories that are derived from evidence. For instance, most scholars agree that none of the Gospel writers were disciples of Jesus during his lifetime. Luke was probably a Gentile and not a Jew. John'due south gospel was written at to the lowest degree in the year 90 CE and perchance as tardily as 100 CE. Another misconception is that the word "Gospel" ways "biography". "Gospel" is Greek and ways "The Expert News". The four gospels that have become "standard" in the Bible are not really biographies. They are emblematic, i.e. philosophical stories, with Jesus as the central figure to convey a kind of philosophical perspective. And the four canonical Gospels are not the just gospels. At that place are a host of other gospels that have been uncovered, each portraying a slightly different Jesus with varying letters. For example, the Gospel of Thomas is strictly a sayings gospel lacking a narrative story.
There is enough differentiation between the iv canonical gospels to imply that they were written for different philosophical goals. In the Gospels of Mark and Matthew, Jesus is much more of a Jewish messiah. Jesus' persecution in Mark reflects a similar persecution suffered past Jews during the showtime defection from 66-70. In Matthew, much of Jesus' story parallels Quondam Attestation scripture, and a genealogy tracing Jesus' lineage from his father Joseph dorsum to Abraham is included. Later, in Luke and in item John, Jesus is a messiah that is more like a Gentile than a Jew, and these Gospels emphasize Jesus beingness in confrontation and in tension with Jews. The Gospel of John is probably the about emblematic and mystical of the iv Gospels and was referred to as "The Spiritual Gospel" by the early on church building. Jesus is portrayed equally an almost serene figure who routinely blasphemes in the synagogues, a very unlike graphic symbol than the man portrayed in Marker'due south gospel. One of the master points fabricated past the scholars is that these gospels were understood to exist read philosophically and not literally.
These are the kinds of issues that are discussed in the documentary. It is non that Evangelical teaching is not of value, simply it is not relevant to a documentary in which scholars are trying to piece together historical evidence to tell a story. The story that they tell is that Jesus is not the first Christian. Jesus was given the title "Christ" by a sect of his followers onetime after his expiry. Jesus of Nazareth became Jesus Christ long afterwards he had died.
xvi out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Well made...but I hated some of the music and didn't really want the homogeneity of opinions.
This is a reasonably well made serial on the life of Jesus and the early church. However well done the shows are, however, 1 thing got to me afterward a while...the music. Now I know that this might seem petty, but later on a scrap I almost felt similar screaming at information technology. Gregorian chants and Jewish cantors singing again and once again and again really made me wish that the testify had been a lot quieter!
The show has a decided aptitude--and this is something that bothered me a bit. A lot of theologians are interviewed but they represent a very narrow band of thought. Ivy League schools and Wedlock Theological stand for a more liberal schoolhouse of thought and tend to look at the New Attestation in a very not-literal and more of a historical indicate of view. No rival thought is given a chance to say anything during the picture. Then, if you lot accept a very literal interpretation of the Bible, and so this may not be something y'all'll want to watch. If, on the other mitt, you don't believe so strongly, then you'll probably get much more out of the show--a testify that has a decidedly humanistic point of view. Still, there is a lot to admire near this series--information technology's worth a look.
iv out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An first-class overview of the early Christians and their founder
Warning: Spoilers
At that place have been some learned men within academia who take questioned whether Christ Jesus was an historical person and who've noted striking parallels between the Christian Messiah -- his nascence, sayings, and miracles -- with those of the Egyptian Horus, for case, among other pre-Christian pagan deities. I personally would like to think of Christ Jesus every bit having been a real person, who walked the world and showed humankind the way to true enlightenment. This infrequent four-part documentary (at almost 4 hours in total runtime) takes the Gospels' word for it that a human such as this had indeed lived -- just as Josephus, an early on Jewish historian, considered Jesus to accept been an actual person (as opposed to an ecclesiastically revised construct).
What a refreshing change this is in listening to educated men and women talk of Christ for hours, neither in disparaging terms nor with religious fervor. It is like sitting in on a history class rather than a church building sermon, which is what makes this documentary series an absolute delight to watch. In speaking of Jesus and the early on Christians from within an historical context, information technology solidifies and brings to life what simply reading the Gospel accounts and the Pauline epistles on their own neglect in doing.
The interviewees in FROM JESUS TO CHRIST are all academics and a pleasure to listen to. Information technology is not merely their noesis of this topic that impressed me, only their lack of ego and pretention as well. Despite their obvious to a higher place-average intellect and studied familiarity with the theme of this programme, they all come beyond every bit down-to-earth, humble and pocket-size people, who brand for four hours of time in their quasi-company well spent and enjoyable.
Here is a documentary series that I think would brand for a great introduction to Christianity for anyone interested in learning about it for the first time. Rather than simply being a biographical sketch of Jesus based on the Gospel accounts, it'southward more a comprehensive and objective (i.e. not preachy) examination of the early Christians (back when it was considered a move), up until the indicate when the faith became institutionalized in and effectually the 3rd century of our mutual era.
This is not a program so much interested in early Christian doctrine and tradition than it is an overview of Jesus, who he was, the followers he acquired (including the conversion of Gentiles), and how these disciples were viewed and treated by not-Christian government. It was interesting for me to learn, for instance, that Christianity in the early centuries was never unified, centralized, but that there were regional differences of interpretation fifty-fifty back then, during that initial menstruum. We learn, too, that there were apocalyptic expectations fifty-fifty dorsum at that time.
One needn't be religious or fifty-fifty a Christian to capeesh this documentary, as I can adjure to this, myself. Many nonreligious folks think null of learning about the early Greeks and Romans, and of existent life figures such as Alexander the Slap-up and Julius Caesar. My feeling is, if someone prefers their Christ Jesus presented from an as historical perspective -- sans dogma and attempts out to catechumen -- then FROM JESUS TO CHRIST makes for a more than satisfactory viewing experience. I myself came away from it with an even deeper respect for the diatessaron.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Well made documentary
Documentary focusing on Jesus, the early church, and Paul. Many of the scholars, such as John Dominic Crossan, are quite liberal and I question some of their conclusions. Wayne Meeks, one of the scholars, is the most balanced of them. At its best it goes into the offset century Jewish and Greco-Roman globe very throughly, with many new things to learn.. Despite some flaws, a well made documentary.
1 out of 1 plant this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Orgy of Speculation
dzrv 8 September 2020
For really smart people, they certain exercise speculate a lot. They also use vast generalizations on Roman life at the time. I get the significance of the DSS but they are incredibly vague and offer little insight. They're basically a about-Fatwa of some sort with next to nothing revealing useful specifics on everyday life. Similar, the Essenes who wrote them weren't an all-star coiffure of reporters and scholars. They were gypsies and hippies.
Too, to essentially classify crucifixions as "no big deal dorsum and so" is beyond preposterous. Every indication was that they were non frequent enough to express mirth off. Every one was must-see TV for the peasantry. Crucifixions were laborious and needed logistics and planning.
The fact that this was made in 1998 and is beingness rehashed now in 2020 (of all years) is all you lot need to know
i out of five found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Source: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0183094/reviews
0 Response to "From Jesus to Christ the First Christians Scholar Review"
Post a Comment